In first century Palestine, the chasm between Jew and Gentile . . .
In first
century Palestine, the chasm between Jew and Gentile was deep and wide. A Jew could not eat with a Gentile, and
certainly would never stay at the house of one.
A Jewish physician was not permitted to care for a Gentile patient, even
if the situation was life-threatening.
In short, Jews had nothing to do with Gentiles—unless, of course, that
Jew was Jesus! Jesus broke all the rules
when it came to Gentiles; and he broke the rules, because he was trying to
break down the walls that separate us.
However,
even during the early church, a remnant of that wall still existed. A perfect example is the story of Peter in
the 10th chapter of Acts.
Peter is on a rooftop, praying and meditating, when he sees the vision
of a sheet descending from the heavens, filled with food, and a voice
commanding him, “Get up and eat.” At
first, Peter refuses, because the sheet contained enough non-kosher food to
uncurl the payos of a Hasidic Rabbi. “By
no means, Lord!” Peter cries out. “For I
have never eaten anything profane or unclean.”
But the
Almighty isn’t kidding about this. God
three-peats the command, leaving poor Peter in a bit of a quandary. Does the Lord really want him to start eating
ham? Apparently so—because the voice is
very clear on the matter. “What God has
made clean, you must not call profane.”
Now, one way
to read this story is to view it simply as a modification of the ancient
dietary laws—almost as if God is saying, “In days of old, you were taught to
eat certain things and avoid others, but I have decided to expand the menu.”
However, if
you ask me, this story actually goes deeper than just giving Peter permission
to try pigs-in-the-blanket. At the heart
of this story is a question, which, frankly, I think we are still wrestling with
today. Namely, is it ever appropriate to
label people? Clean vs. unclean, liberal
vs. conservative, management vs. labor, us vs. them.
Let’s face
it; too often the practice of pigeonholing people is really being used as a
clever exit strategy. In other words, if
I can categorize you, then I am relieved of the responsibility of actually
getting to know you. I can make a snap
judgment—based on how you look, or what you do for a living, or where you’re
from, or whom you voted for in the last election—and armed with all of these
assumptions, I can safely turn and walk away.
Jesus took
an entirely different approach. He was
all about helping people feel included, not excluded. Indeed, Jesus seems to want us to view others
the same way we view ourselves.
Blemished, perhaps. Incomplete, certainly. But
still redeemed and restored through the grace of God.
Throughout
our lives, we will come across countless people, and we will always have a
choice. Label them or love them. We know what Jesus’ choice was—just look at
what he did with us!
1 Comments:
A couple of thoughts: First, while it sounds great to suggest we should never label anyone, it's not a practical idea. Labels are very useful. Try to go through life without ever using any labels for anyone. I don't think you'll be able to do it.
Second, this is at least the second blog post I recall in which Dr Crilley has seemed to endorse universalism -- but not so clearly that I'm sure he subscribes to that belief. I'll keep reading, and maybe it will be clarified in the future.
By Anonymous, at 8:17 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home