Best to be honest; the ending of Mark’s Gospel leaves a lot to be desired.
Best to be honest; the ending of Mark’s Gospel leaves a lot
to be desired. Almost all scholars agree
that Mark ends his gospel at chapter 16, verse 8. However, if you take a quick look at your
Bible, you will notice that there are two alternate endings—a shorter ending
(verse 8b) and a longer ending (verses 9-20).
Since none of the earliest manuscripts contain these endings, the
general consensus is that they were added later, perhaps centuries later.
I can understand why someone might have done that, though,
because while Mark starts off the resurrection story well enough—the women go
to the tomb, and hear that Jesus Christ has been raised from the dead—he seems
to botch the ending completely: “So the women went out and fled from the tomb,
for terror and amazement had seized them; and they said nothing to anyone, for
they were afraid.”
As an ending, that’s not very satisfying, is it? For starters, it’s the only resurrection
story in the New Testament where the risen Christ never makes an
appearance. That’s problematic, in and
of itself. But to make matters worse,
the women don’t do the one thing that they’re supposed to do. The angel who meets them at the empty tomb is
very specific: “Go and tell the disciples and Peter that Jesus is going ahead
of them to Galilee.” But according to
Mark, the women never deliver that message.
They flee from the tomb, filled with fear, and don’t say a thing to
anyone!
And that’s where Mark ends his gospel—a resurrection story, without
the risen Christ, and in which the only witnesses fall silent. So it’s not surprising that a
well-intentioned scribe, at some later point, decides, “I think this needs to
be fixed,” and adds a few sentences that, while they don’t sound anything like
the rest of Mark, at least bring the story to a more satisfying conclusion.
However, I would like to suggest that Mark deserves a little
more credit than that. I do not believe
that he is a bad writer, or that he couldn’t come up with a good ending and so
he just quit. Perhaps Mark put down his
pen at verse 8, because he intentionally wants to keep his gospel open-ended.
In other words, I think Mark is inviting his
audience—meaning you and me—to be more than merely spectators. He is offering us an opportunity to play a
part in this story. It’s almost as if he
is saying, “Okay, now it’s your turn.
You get to pick up where the women left off. It’s time to start spreading the word that
Jesus Christ is risen. He is risen,
indeed!” Looking at it that
way, this is not a bad ending; it’s a brilliant ending, because it signifies
that the story of the resurrection doesn’t stop with those first
witnesses. It lives on through us!
3 Comments:
Who was the incompetent researcher (or competent hoodwinker) who told you that "None of the earliest manuscripts contain these endings"? Mark 16:9-20 is in Codex Alexandrinus, and Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus, and Codex Bezae (damaged, but extant up to 16:15a), and Codex Washingtoniensis (with the Freer Logion between v. 14 and v. 15).
Only two early Greek manuscripts stop Mark's text at 16:8 -- Vaticanus (in which the copyist placed extra blank space after v. 8, as if recollecting the absent verses and attempting to reserve space for them), from c. 325, and Sinaiticus (in which the pages containing Mk. 14:54-Lk. 1:56 were replaced), c. 350. All other undamaged Greek manuscripts of Mark 16 -- from wide-ranging locales -- include verses 9-20. In addition, there is evidence to support the inclusion of these 12 verses that pre-dates the earliest extant manuscripts: in the 100's, Justin Martyr (c. 160) made a strong allusion to Mark 16:20; Tatian (c. 170) incorporated about the entire passage into his Diatessaron, and Irenaeus (c. 184) specifically quoted Mk. 16:19 in "Against Heresies" Book 3, ch. 10. It would be crazy to ignore this patristic testimony just because the copies of Mark used by those writers didn't happen to survive.
Test your research-materials! Neither Metzger, nor the ESV, nor the ESV are reliable on this particular subject.
Yours in Christ,
James Snapp, Jr.
By James Snapp Jr, at 11:03 PM
(Nor the NET, that is.)
By James Snapp Jr, at 9:33 AM
Wonderful thought to make Mark's Gospel our own and complete it.
By Anonymous, at 5:33 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home